Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
1.
Curr Opin Rheumatol ; 36(2): 113-119, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126228

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The landscape for treatment of rheumatic diseases is ever evolving, with several new drugs recently approved across diseases and more in the pipeline. This timely review aims to highlight the latest literature on long-term safety profiles of salient established and emerging biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). RECENT FINDINGS: The risk of infection remains elevated with the use of most b and tsDMARDs, with specifically risk of hepatitis B reactivation with rituximab and zoster infection with JAK inhibitors (JAKi). The results of the ORAL surveillance trial led to new black box warnings for JAKi and evoked critical risk-benefit discussions surrounding JAKi and DMARDs overall. SUMMARY: Such well conducted trials are needed to gather long term comparative safety data of DMARDs. In the interim, real world observational studies also have a role to play in our understanding of long-term drug safety, provided that detailed attention is paid to minimize biases inherent in observational studies.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Rheumatology , Synthetic Drugs , Humans , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Biological Products/adverse effects , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use
2.
Urologie ; 62(10): 1048-1056, 2023 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796278

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, in German guidelines: benign prostatic syndrome [BPS]) is considered the most common disease of the lower urinary tract in men and can have a tremendous impact on the quality-of-life of affected patients. Conservative and pharmacological therapy of this disease are of great importance, both in improving LUTS and reducing progression-related complications. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of the conservative and pharmacological treatment options according to the current German S2e guideline on BPS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summary and overview of chapters 9 and 10 of the current German S2e guideline on BPS. RESULTS: In addition to a controlled watchful waiting for BPS patients without an absolute indication for prostate surgery, a variety of phytopharmacological formulations and synthetic drugs according to the symptomatology and clinical progress are available. Phytotherapy should, due to inconsistent study data, only be considered for mild to moderate symptoms. Synthetic drugs include alpha-blockers, 5α-reductase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, antimuscarinics and, more recently, the ß3-agonist mirabegron in the current guideline. In addition, various combination therapies are listed and evaluated according to their indications, effects and side effects. CONCLUSIONS: The current German S2e guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of BPS provides an evidence-based foundation for finding the best possible and most effective medication.


Subject(s)
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Synthetic Drugs , Male , Humans , Prostatic Hyperplasia/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Prostate , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/diagnosis , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
3.
Eur J Med Chem ; 258: 115609, 2023 Oct 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37421889

ABSTRACT

Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease and categorised as a neglected tropical disease (NTD). Each year, between 70,0000 and 1 million new cases are believed to occur. There are approximately 90 sandfly species which can spread the Leishmania parasites (over 20 species) causing 20,000 to 30,000 death per year. Currently, leishmaniasis has no specific therapeutic treatment available. The prescribed drugs with several drawbacks including high cost, challenging administration, toxicity, and drug resistance led to search for the alternative treatment with less toxicity and selectivity. Introducing the molecular features like that of phytoconstituents for the search of compounds with less toxicity is another promising approach. The current review classifies the synthetic compounds according to the core rings present in the natural phytochemicals for the development of antileishmanial agents (2020-2022). Considering the toxicity and limitations of synthetic analogues, natural compounds are at the higher notch in terms of effectiveness and safety. Synthesized compounds of chalcones (Compound 8; IC50: 0.03 µM, 4.7 folds more potent than Amphotericin B; IC50: 0.14 µM), pyrimidine (compound 56; against L. tropica; 0.04 µM and L. infantum; 0.042 µM as compared to glucantime: L. tropica; 8.17 µM and L. infantum; 8.42 µM), quinazoline and (compound 72; 0.021 µM, 150 times more potent than miltefosine). The targeted delivery against DHFR have been demonstrated by one of the pyrimidine compounds 62 with an IC50 value of 0.10 µM against L. major as compared to the standard trimethoprim (IC50: 20 µM). The review covers the medicinal importance of antileishmanial agents from synthetic and natural sources such as chalcone, pyrazole, coumarins, steroids, and alkaloidal-containing drugs (indole, quinolines, pyridine, pyrimidine, carbolines, pyrrole, aurones, and quinazolines). The efforts of introducing the core rings present in the natural phytoconstituents as antileishmanial in the synthetic compounds are discussed with their structural activity relationship. The perspective will support the medicinal chemists in refining and directing the development of novel molecules phytochemicals-based antileishmanial agents.


Subject(s)
Antiprotozoal Agents , Leishmania , Leishmaniasis , Parasites , Synthetic Drugs , Animals , Humans , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Leishmaniasis/drug therapy , Antiprotozoal Agents/chemistry
4.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36734911

ABSTRACT

Inflammation is a defense mechanism of the body against harmful stimuli/organisms. Even if it is the body's defense mechanism, these mediators may affect different ways in the human body and can lead to chronic disorders. The most common treatment strategy for the acute type of inflammation mainly includes synthetic chemical drugs; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and immunosuppressant drugs whereas these synthetic drugs have many side effects, adverse effects, and limitations. Herbal drugs can be a promising alternative to these synthetic drugs but they too have limitations. Recent advances in the nanotechnology field can be combined with herbal drugs to overcome the limitations. Research works done on topical nanophyto pharmaceuticals for anti-inflammatory activity were compiled and in all the studies, clear evidence is indicated for the increased penetration, distribution, and increased efficacy of phytopharmaceuticals when formulated into nano dosage forms. Considering the adverse effects and limitations of most widely used synthetic drugs, topical nano Phyto pharmaceuticals can play a pivotal role in the local and systemic delivery of promising phytoconstituents to a specific site of the body.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Synthetic Drugs , Humans , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Inflammation/drug therapy , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
5.
Ter Arkh ; 94(5): 605-609, 2022 Jun 17.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36286957

ABSTRACT

Despite great advances in the diagnosis and treatment of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases, which have led to a significant improvement in the prognosis in many patients, the fundamental medical problems of this pathology the restoration of the quality of life and the reduction of mortality to the population level are far from being resolved. This served as a stimulus for the study of new approaches to the pharmacotherapy of IVRD, one of which is associated with the use of low molecular weight chemically synthesized drugs that inhibit intracellular "signaling" molecules Janus kinase. Modern advances regarding the use of Janus kinase inhibitors in the treatment of immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases and COVID -19 are considered.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Rheumatic Diseases , Synthetic Drugs , Humans , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Rheumatic Diseases/drug therapy , Janus Kinases/therapeutic use , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
6.
J Med Food ; 25(10): 952-962, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36260139

ABSTRACT

High blood pressure has been recognized as one of the main risk factors of cardiometabolic syndrome by health organizations. Hypertension is medicated by various classes of synthetic drugs; however, adverse effects have repeatedly been reported. Moreover, natural alternatives such as fish peptides have been effective in the treatment and prevention of hypertension. The aim of our study was to fractionate and identify antihypertensive peptides. Fractions were produced using different techniques of solid-phase extraction (SPE), pressure-driven ultrafiltration (UF), and electro04dialysis with UF membrane. According to our results, the hydrophobic fraction of SPE (IC50 5 µg) was the most potent anti-angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) product. Findings of the study suggest that the separation technique plays an important role in the isolation efficiency of antihypertensive biopeptides. Importantly, the hydrophobic fraction's activity was retained through a static model of an in vitro gastrointestinal digestion system. In conclusion, polarity regardless of charge and size was the most important factor for anti-ACE activity of an Atlantic mackerel biopeptide. In addition, the presence of leucine at either of the extremities (C- or N-terminal) and/or leucine-rich motifs could well explain the hypotensive effect of our active fraction.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Perciformes , Synthetic Drugs , Animals , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Leucine , Hypertension/drug therapy , Peptides/pharmacology , Peptides/chemistry , Digestion , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
7.
Molecules ; 27(18)2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36144587

ABSTRACT

The main characteristic feature of diabetes mellitus is the disturbance of carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism, which results in insulin insufficiency and can also lead to insulin resistance. Both the acute and chronic diabetic cases are increasing at an exponential rate, which is also flagged by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF). Treatment of diabetes mellitus with synthetic drugs often fails to provide desired results and limits its use to symptomatic treatment only. This has resulted in the exploration of alternative medicine, of which herbal treatment is gaining popularity these days. Owing to their safety benefits, treatment compliance, and ability to exhibit effects without disturbing internal homeostasis, research in the field of herbal and ayurvedic treatments has gained importance. Medicinal phytoconstituents include micronutrients, amino acids, proteins, mucilage, critical oils, triterpenoids, saponins, carotenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic acids, tannins, and coumarins, which play a dynamic function in the prevention and treatment of diabetes mellitus. Alkaloids found in medicinal plants represent an intriguing potential for the inception of novel approaches to diabetes mellitus therapies. Thus, this review article highlights detailed information on alkaloidal phytoconstituents, which includes sources and structures of alkaloids along with the associated mechanism involved in the management of diabetes mellitus. From the available literature and data presented, it can be concluded that these compounds hold tremendous potential for use as monotherapies or in combination with current treatments, which can result in the development of better efficacy and safety profiles.


Subject(s)
Alkaloids , Diabetes Mellitus , Saponins , Synthetic Drugs , Triterpenes , Alkaloids/therapeutic use , Amino Acids/therapeutic use , Carbohydrates , Carotenoids/therapeutic use , Coumarins/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus/drug therapy , Flavonoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Insulin/therapeutic use , Lipids/therapeutic use , Micronutrients/therapeutic use , Oils/therapeutic use , Phytotherapy , Saponins/therapeutic use , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Tannins/therapeutic use , Triterpenes/therapeutic use
8.
Chemosphere ; 307(Pt 3): 136020, 2022 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35985383

ABSTRACT

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs) are conditions that cause neuron structure and/or function to deteriorate over time. Genetic alterations may be responsible for several NDDs. However, a multitude of physiological systems can trigger neurodegeneration. Several NDDs, such as Huntington's, Parkinson's, and Alzheimer's, are assigned to oxidative stress (OS). Low concentrations of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species are crucial for maintaining normal brain activities, as their increasing concentrations can promote neural apoptosis. OS-mediated neurodegeneration has been linked to several factors, including notable dysfunction of mitochondria, excitotoxicity, and Ca2+ stress. However, synthetic drugs are commonly utilized to treat most NDDs, and these treatments have been known to have side effects during treatment. According to providing empirical evidence, studies have discovered many occurring natural components in plants used to treat NDDs. Polyphenols are often safer and have lesser side effects. As, epigallocatechin-3-gallate, resveratrol, curcumin, quercetin, celastrol, berberine, genistein, and luteolin have p-values less than 0.05, so they are typically considered to be statistically significant. These polyphenols could be a choice of interest as therapeutics for NDDs. This review highlighted to discusses the putative effectiveness of polyphenols against the most prevalent NDDs.


Subject(s)
Berberine , Curcumin , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Synthetic Drugs , Curcumin/therapeutic use , Genistein , Humans , Luteolin/therapeutic use , Neurodegenerative Diseases/drug therapy , Nitrogen , Oxygen , Polyphenols/pharmacology , Polyphenols/therapeutic use , Quercetin , Resveratrol , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
9.
J Food Biochem ; 46(10): e14290, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35796441

ABSTRACT

Men with diabetes have negative effects on reproduction that causes sexual dysfunction. Medicinal plants are non-toxic and much safer than synthetic drugs because regular use of synthetic drugs shows long-term side effects. Curcuma amada (Roxb) is a medicinal plant used in Ayurveda and Unani medicinal systems in India. The goal of this study is to rummage the potential efficiency of the most potent solvent fraction of effective extract of hydro-methanol 60:40 of C. amada rhizome on male gonadal hypofunction in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat. Diabetes-induced testicular hypofunction was evaluated by glycemic, spermiological, biochemical, genomic, flow cytometric, and histology of testicular tissue. The n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl-acetate, and n-butanol solvent fractions of the said extract were administrated for 4 weeks at 10 mg dose/100 g body weight/day. Among all the used fractions, the ethyl-acetate solvent fraction-treated group showed maximum recovery in serum insulin (177.42%), sperm count (92.84%), sperm motility (97.15%), and serum testosterone (164.33%). The diabetic rats treated with ethyl-acetate solvent fraction also exhibited the maximum resettlement in flow cytometric analysis of sperm viability (55.84%) and sperm mitochondrial integrity (149.79%), gene expression patterns of key markers for androgenesis (Δ5, 3ß-HSD 87.50%, and 17ß-HSD 74.66%) and apoptosis (Bax 44.63%, Bcl-2 54.03%, and Caspase-3 35.77%) along with testicular histology. The ethyl-acetate fraction contains alkaloids, flavonoids, and polyphenols where all of these components are not present in other fractions, may be the most effective cause for the recovery of diabetes-linked oxidative stress-mediated testicular hypofunctions. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Nowadays worldwide, the use of synthetic drugs are reduced due to their toxic effect. At present, synthetic drugs are replaced by several herbal drugs, the natural source of medicine which has many therapeutic values. C. amada has strong antioxidant activity due to the presence of bio-active compound(s) that can able to manage streptozotocin-induced diabetes linked to oxidative damage of male gonadal organs. Therefore, these bio-active compound(s)-containing said medicinal plant may use as a good source of antioxidative food in the food industry as nutraceuticals and in pharmaceutical industries for the development of the herbal drug to manage diabetes-linked male gonadal hypofunctions. At present, WHO also gives emphasis for developing one drug-multi-disease therapy. From such a viewpoint, this active fraction-containing phytomolecules may have corrective efficacy against diabetes as well as oxidative stress-linked testicular complications.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental , Infertility, Male , Insulins , Synthetic Drugs , 1-Butanol/analysis , 1-Butanol/pharmacology , 1-Butanol/therapeutic use , Acetates/pharmacology , Animals , Antioxidants/chemistry , Apoptosis , Caspase 3 , Chloroform/analysis , Chloroform/pharmacology , Chloroform/therapeutic use , Curcuma/chemistry , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/drug therapy , Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/metabolism , Flavonoids/analysis , Humans , Infertility, Male/complications , Infertility, Male/etiology , Insulins/analysis , Insulins/pharmacology , Insulins/therapeutic use , Male , Methanol , Plant Extracts/analysis , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism , Rats , Rhizome/chemistry , Solvents/analysis , Solvents/pharmacology , Solvents/therapeutic use , Sperm Motility , Streptozocin , Synthetic Drugs/analysis , Synthetic Drugs/pharmacology , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Testosterone , bcl-2-Associated X Protein/genetics
10.
J Nutr Biochem ; 109: 109101, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35777588

ABSTRACT

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic disorder associated with the inflammation in the digestive tract. The exact cause of IBD is unknown; nevertheless, in IBD, the homeostasis of key regulatory factors involved in intestinal immunity has been documented to be disrupted. Despite the lack of a viable treatment for IBD, synthetic drugs and monoclonal antibodies are currently used to treat it. However, these treatments have side effects, and the high relapse rate limits their usage. Dietary polyphenols constitute a great variety of compounds and have shown an array of biological properties. Resveratrol is a natural polyphenol found in grapevines and berries. The therapeutic ability of resveratrol against IBD is amply demonstrated in many in vivo studies. Resveratrol can interact with several molecular targets (Nf-kB, SIRT1, mTOR, HIF-1α, miRNAs, and TNF-α) and effectively prevent/ alleviate IBD symptoms with promising results. Although resveratrol has profound anti-inflammatory properties against IBD, its therapeutic employment is limited due to its low water solubility, less chemical stability, less bioavailability, and rapid metabolism in vivo. Hence, resveratrol encapsulation using different carries and its controlled release has become a promising strategy to overcome limitations. Herein, we meticulously review, talk-over the anti-inflammatory effect and mechanisms of resveratrol in IBD. We further provide the latest information on resveratrol formulations and nano-delivery systems used in oral delivery of resveratrol for the treatment of IBD and offer our view on future research on resveratrol in IBD treatment.


Subject(s)
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , MicroRNAs , Synthetic Drugs , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Humans , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/drug therapy , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/metabolism , MicroRNAs/therapeutic use , NF-kappa B , Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System , Polyphenols/therapeutic use , Resveratrol/pharmacology , Resveratrol/therapeutic use , Sirtuin 1 , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Water
11.
Appl Biochem Biotechnol ; 194(10): 4683-4701, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35819691

ABSTRACT

Insulin resistance (IR) is a condition of impaired response of cells towards insulin. It is marked by excessive blood glucose, dysregulated insulin signalling, altered pathways, damaged pancreatic ß-cells, metabolic disorders, etc. Chronic hyperglycemic conditions leads to type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) which causes excess generation of highly reactive free radicals, causing oxidative stress, further leading to development and progression of complications like vascular dysfunction, damaged cellular proteins, and DNA. One of the causes for IR is dysregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B). Advancements in drug therapeutics have helped people manage IR by regulating PTP1B, however have been reported to cause side effects. Therefore, there is a growing interest on usage of phytochemical constituents having IR therapeutic properties and aiding to minimize these complications. Medicinal plants have not been utilized to their full potential as a therapeutic drug due to lack of knowledge of their active and effective chemical constituents, mode of action, regulation of IR parameters, and dosage of administration. This review highlights phytochemical constituents present in medicinal plants or spices, their potential effectiveness on proteins (PTP1B) regulating IR, and reported possible mechanism of action studied on in vitro models. The study gives current knowledge and future recommendations on the above aspects and is expected to be beneficial in developing herbal drug using these phytochemical constituents, either alone or in combination, for medication of IR and diabetes.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Insulin Resistance , Synthetic Drugs , Blood Glucose , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Humans , Insulin/metabolism , Phosphoric Monoester Hydrolases/therapeutic use , Phytochemicals/pharmacology , Phytochemicals/therapeutic use , Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 1/genetics , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
12.
s.l; CONETEC; 3 jun. 2022.
Non-conventional in Spanish | LILACS, BRISA/RedTESA | ID: biblio-1371525

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: El remdesivir fue evaluado originalmente en ensayos clínicos para abordar el brote de virus del ébola en 2014.(13) Con la demostración de que remdesivir poseía una amplia actividad contra otros virus de ARN, incluidos los coronavirus, múltiples grupos evaluaron su actividad antiviral in vitro como in vivo en otras indicaciones. Posteriormente, se confirmó su actividad antiviral contra los coronavirus zoonóticos MERS, así como los coronavirus humanos circulantes HCoV-OC43 y HCoV-229E, agentes causantes del resfriado común.(14) Recientemente, también ha demostrado su actividad in vitro frente al SARS-CoV-2.(15) En un modelo de macaco Rhesus con infección por SARS-CoV-2 donde el tratamiento con remdesivir se inició poco después de la inoculación, los animales tratados con este fármaco presentaron niveles de virus más bajos en los pulmones y menos daño pulmonar respecto a los animales de control. Aunque este modelo animal no representa la enfermedad grave observada en algunos pacientes con COVID-19, se tomaron estos hallazgos como una posibilidad biológica para iniciar estudios clínicos con este fármaco antiviral en pacientes con COVID-19. OBJETIVO: El objetivo del presente informe es evaluar parámetros de eficacia, seguridad, conveniencia y recomendaciones disponibles acerca del empleo de remdesivir para el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19 en Argentina. MÉTODOS: Efectos en la Salud: Teniendo en cuenta la velocidad con la que la información relacionada a la pandemia aparece y se modifica, se desarrolló un protocolo sustentado en proyectos que resume activamente la evidencia científica a medida que la misma se hace disponible. Con este fin se utilizó la plataforma L- ove de Epistemonikos https://app.iloveevidence.com/topics para identificar revisiones sistemáticas "vivas". Se seleccionaron aquellas con una calidad metodológica apropiada evaluada a través de la herramienta AMSTAR-2, y que a su vez llevaran un proceso de actualización frecuente. De cada una de las revisiones sistemáticas identificadas se extractaron los efectos de la intervención sobre los desenlaces priorizados como importantes o críticos y la certeza en dichos efectos. Para la priorización de los desenlaces se adoptó una perspectiva desde el paciente considerando sus potenciales preferencias. La selección se realizó por consenso entre los autores y supervisores del informe considerando los resultados de múltiples ejercicios de priorización publicados, realizados en el marco del desarrollo de distintas guías de práctica clínica. Implementación: Este dominio contempla dos subdominios: la existencia de barreras y facilitadores en nuestro contexto para la implementación de la tecnología evaluada no consideradas en los otros dominios analizados, y los costos comparativos en relación con otras intervenciones similares. Con el objetivo de emitir un juicio de valor sobre la magnitud de dichos costos, en pacientes hospitalizados se utilizó como comparador al tratamiento con dexametasona, que ha demostrado ser una intervención accesible y de beneficios importantes en el contexto analizado. Recomendaciones: Para la identificación de recomendaciones sustentadas en evidencia y actualizadas, se utilizó la plataforma COVID recmap. Se seleccionaron aquellas guías con rigor metodológico apropiado según la herramienta AGREE II (> 70%) y se incorporaron sus recomendaciones al informe. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron tres revisiones sistemáticas que cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión del presente informe y reportaron resultados: Las revisiones sistemáticas identificadas incluyeron 12 estudios aleatorizados para remdesivir en COVID19 que aleatorizaron un total de 9869 pacientes. Los resultados de 12 ECCA, incluyendo los resultados finales del ensayo SOLIDARITY, muestran que, en pacientes hospitalizados con COVID-19 y enfermedad de moderada a crítica, el remdesivir probablemente reduce la mortalidad y la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva, y podría mejorar el tiempo de resolución de los síntomas. La certeza de la evidencia fue clasificada como moderada debido a la imprecisión. En pacientes con enfermedad leve de comienzo reciente, el remdesivir podría reducir las hospitalizaciones, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja también por imprecisión. Adicionalmente, existe información sobre la efectividad in vitro de remdesivir frente a las diferentes variantes de SARS-CoV-2. Esta información se encuentra disponible en OpenData Portal, que condensa lo reportado por conjunto priorizado de publicaciones (preprints y artículos revisados por pares). resultados muestran que remdesivir podría tener una efectividad similar frente a las nuevas variantes del SARS-CoV-2, incluida Omicrón y subvariantes (B.1.1.529; BA.1.1; BA.1; BA.1 [+Q493K]; BA.2; B.1.1.529 [+F694Y] en comparación de las variantes predominantes al momento de realizarse los estudios. CONCLUSIONES: El cuerpo de la evidencia disponible, muestra que en pacientes con enfermedad leve o de reciente comienzo y factores de riesgo para progresión a enfermedad severa, remdesivir podría disminuir las hospitalizaciones y podría aumentar la velocidad para la mejoría clínica y resolución de los sintomas. Sin embargo, la magnitud de la reducción solo resulta importante (mayor a 1%) para pacientes sin esquema de vacunación completo o con riesgo de respuesta inmune inapropriada. En pacientes hospitalizados con enfermedad severa en cambio, el remdesivir probablemente reduce la mortalidad y la necesidad de ventilación mecánica invasiva y podría mejorar el tiempo de resolución de los síntomas, sin aumentar los eventos adversos sérios. A pesar que remdesivir se encuentra autorizado para su comercialización en Argentina, existen algunas situaciones que podrían constituir barreras para el acceso. La vía de administración endovenosa podría no ser aceptada en personas con enfermedad leve. Además, el costo del tratamiento es muy elevado y existe una extensa población objetivo para la aplicación de este tratamiento, que podrían constituir también barreras de acceso. Las guías sugieren el tratamiento con remdesivir condicionado a aquellos pacientes no graves con mayor riesgo de hospitalización. También sugieren en forma condicional utilizar remdesivir en pacientes hospitalizados que requieren oxígeno y recomiendan fuertemente no utilizar en adultos hospitalizados con COVID-19 que requieran ventilación no invasiva o invasiva. En el contexto de América Latina y el Caribe, se sugirió que cada país debe evaluar la decisión de su uso con base en los recursos disponibles, la factibilidad de su implementación, el acceso, los factores específicos del paciente (p. ej., la duración de los síntomas, el funcionamiento renal, las interacciones farmacológicas), la cobertura de vacunación y la forma de administración. También, es importante que se determine la capacidad de los servicios para poder administrar los medicamentos y considerar el tiempo adecuado para su uso.


Subject(s)
Humans , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , COVID-19/drug therapy , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Efficacy , Cost-Benefit Analysis
13.
Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed) ; 18(1): 33-41, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35090610

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop recommendations for the management of methotrexate (MTX) when considering the combination with biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Eleven experts on RA were selected. Two coordinators formulated 13 questions about the combination therapy of MTX with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. A systematic review was conducted to answer the questions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established as well as the search strategies (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2019). Two reviewers selected the articles and collected data. Simultaneously, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were evaluated. Based on this evidence, the coordinators proposed preliminary recommendations that the experts discussed and voted in a nominal group meeting. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine and the level of agreement with a Delphi. Agreement was established if at least 80% of the experts voted 'yes' (yes/no). RESULTS: The systematic review retrieved 513 citations of which 61 were finally included. A total of 10 recommendations were generated, voted and accepted. The level of agreement was very high in all of them and it was achieved in the first Delphi round. Final recommendations cover aspects such as the optimal MTX dosage, tapering strategy or patients' risk management. CONCLUSIONS: This document is intended to help clinicians solve usual clinical questions and facilitate decision making when treating RA patients with MTX in combination with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Synthetic Drugs , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
14.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 18(1): 33-41, Ene. 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-204780

ABSTRACT

Objective: We aimed to develop recommendations for the management of methotrexate (MTX) when considering the combination with biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Eleven experts on RA were selected. Two coordinators formulated 13 questions about the combination therapy of MTX with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. A systematic review was conducted to answer the questions. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were established as well as the search strategies (Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched up to January 2019). Two reviewers selected the articles and collected data. Simultaneously, EULAR and ACR meeting abstracts were evaluated. Based on this evidence, the coordinators proposed preliminary recommendations that the experts discussed and voted in a nominal group meeting. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation was established using the Oxford Center for Evidence Based Medicine and the level of agreement with a Delphi. Agreement was established if at least 80% of the experts voted ‘yes’ (yes/no). Results: The systematic review retrieved 513 citations of which 61 were finally included. A total of 10 recommendations were generated, voted and accepted. The level of agreement was very high in all of them and it was achieved in the first Delphi round. Final recommendations cover aspects such as the optimal MTX dosage, tapering strategy or patients’ risk management. Conclusions: This document is intended to help clinicians solve usual clinical questions and facilitate decision making when treating RA patients with MTX in combination with bDMARDs or tsDMARDs.(AU)


Objetivo: Desarrollar recomendaciones sobre el uso de metotrexato (MTX) en combinación con medicamentos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) biológicos (b) o sintéticos específicos (ts) en la artritis reumatoide (AR). Métodos: Se seleccionaron 11 expertos en AR. Dos coordinadores formularon 13 preguntas sobre la terapia combinada de MTX con bDMARD o tsDMARD. Se realizó una revisión sistemática para responder las preguntas. Se establecieron criterios de inclusión y exclusión, así como las estrategias de búsqueda (se realizaron búsquedas en Medline, Embase y la Biblioteca Cochrane hasta enero de 2019). Dos revisores seleccionaron los artículos y recopilaron datos. Simultáneamente, se evaluaron los resúmenes de las reuniones EULAR y ACR. Con base en esta evidencia, los coordinadores propusieron recomendaciones preliminares que los expertos discutieron y votaron en una reunión de grupo nominal. El nivel de evidencia y el grado de recomendación se establecieron utilizando el Centro de Oxford para Medicina Basada en Evidencia y el nivel de acuerdo con un Delphi. El acuerdo se estableció si al menos el 80% de los expertos votaron «sí» (sí/no). Resultados: La revisión sistemática recuperó 513 citas, de las cuales finalmente se incluyeron 61. Se generaron, votaron y aceptaron un total de 10 recomendaciones. El nivel de acuerdo fue muy alto en todas ellas y se logró en la primera ronda de Delphi. Las recomendaciones finales cubren aspectos como la dosis óptima de MTX, la estrategia de reducción o la gestión del riesgo de los pacientes. Conclusiones: Este documento está destinado a ayudar a los médicos a resolver preguntas clínicas habituales y facilitar la toma de decisiones al tratar a pacientes con AR con MTX, en combinación con bDMARD o tsDMARD.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Rheumatology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Drug Combinations , Drug Therapy, Combination
15.
Daru ; 29(2): 449-467, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34762250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Due to the rapid spread of COVID-19 worldwide, many countries have designed clinical trials to find efficient treatments. We aimed to critically report the characteristics of all the registered and published randomized clinical trials (RCTs) conducted on COVID-19, and summarize the evaluation of potential therapies developed in various regions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We comprehensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and Clinicaltrial.gov databases to retrieve all the relevant studies up to July 19, 2021, in conformity with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart. We included all English-language published/registered RCTs on COVID-19, and excluded non-RCT, in-vitro/in-vivo, editorials, and review studies. Two reviewers independently evaluated all the records, and then analyzed by using SPSS 17. RESULTS: Within 3018 included studies, 2801 (92.8%) and 217 (7.2%) were registered or published RCTs consisting of about 600 synthetic drugs. Herbal medicines have been studied in 23 trials (10.6%) among the published RCTs and in 357 registered RCTs (12.7%). Hydroxychloroquine 23 (10.6%) and convalescent plasma 194 (6.9%) alone or in combination with other agents were the most frequently used interventions in published and registered RCTs, respectively. Most published RCTs have been conducted in Western Pacific Region (WPRO) (50 trials, 23.0%) including 45 trials from China. Also, a greater proportion of registered RCTs have been conducted in the Region of the Americas (PAHO) (885 trials, 31.6%) including 596 RCTs from the United States (U.S). Globally, 283 registered trials have been conducted to assess new developed vaccines for COVID or previously established for other disorders. CONCLUSION: The present study highlighted the wide range of potential therapeutic agents in published and registered COVID-19 clinical trials across a wide range of regions. However, it is urgently required to global coordination in order to conduct more well-designed trials and progress in discovering safe and effective treatments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Publications/statistics & numerical data , Synthetic Drugs/classification , Clinical Trials as Topic , Humans , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
16.
Pak J Biol Sci ; 24(10): 1067-1076, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34842377

ABSTRACT

<b>Background and Objective:</b> Natural and Synthetic Zeolite (SZ) is potentially useful for biopharmaceuticals and bio tools due to its unique and outstanding physical and chemical properties. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the possible effect of synthetic zeolite in (STZ)-induced diabetic rats. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> About 4 groups of rats were used, (I) normal control, (II) SZ group, (300 mg/kg/day), (III) STZ group, diabetic rats acted as positive control and (IV) STZ+SZ group, included diabetic rats treated with synthetic zeolite (300 mg/kg/day), statistical analysis comparisons between means were carried out using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a post hock (Tukey) multiple comparisons test at p<u>></u>0.05. <b>Results:</b> After six weeks, treatment of diabetic animals with synthetic zeolite markedly exhibited a significant reduction in glucose, lipids, DNA fragmentation, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALAT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (ASAT), urea, creatinine, Malondialdehyde (MDA) and Nitric Oxide (NO) levels concomitant with a significant rise in insulin, Glutathione (GSH), Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) and Catalase (CAT) values close to the corresponding values of healthy ones. <b>Conclusion:</b> In conclusion, synthetic zeolite exhibits multi-health benefits with promising potentials against STZ-induced diabetes, this behaviour may be attributed to its antioxidant and free radical scavenging mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental/drug therapy , Zeolites/pharmacology , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Egypt , Rats, Wistar , Synthetic Drugs/pharmacology , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Zeolites/therapeutic use
17.
Semin Arthritis Rheum ; 51(6): 1205-1217, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34689007

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing evidence to support safe use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) and other biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) during pre-conception/pregnancy, there remains a paucity of evidence regarding the safety and compatibility of other non-TNFi and novel targeted synthetic (ts)DMARDs during pre-conception/pregnancy. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review to determine the compatibility of these drugs in pre-conception, during pregnancy and post-partum period. METHOD: Databases including; EMBASE, Pubmed (MEDLINE), and Cochrane were searched up to 23rd October 2020 to find relevant peer-reviewed papers, using keywords including; rheumatic disease, pregnancy, conception/pre-conception, lactation/breastfeeding, childhood and vaccination/infection, and commonly prescribed non-TNFi drugs and tsDMARDs. RESULTS: Our search yielded 1483 papers that were screened independently by two authors, and 109 full-text papers were eligible for final analysis. These studies reported 1291 maternal pregnancies exposed to non-TNFi bDMARDs and tsDMARDs with known outcomes, including 721 live births, 219 spontaneous miscarriages and 27 congenital abnormalities. Paternal exposures in 174 pregnancies had reassuring outcomes. A total of 48 breastfed infants were exposed to non-TNFi bDMARDs and no adverse events reported upon long-term follow-up. Fifteen infants exposed to bDMARDs received normal vaccination regimes, including live vaccines, and had normal developmental outcomes, without any complications or infections. CONCLUSION: Overall, the findings are reassuring and do not suggest a cause for any major concerns or an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes for maternal or paternal exposures to non-TNFi bDMARDs or tsDMARDs. There were no major concerns for breastfeeding exposures to non-TNFi bDMARDs.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Rheumatic Diseases , Synthetic Drugs , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Rheumatic Diseases/complications , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors/adverse effects
18.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 22(11): 1417-1427, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711241

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Over the past two decades, deeper understanding of B-cell signaling pathways and other mechanisms of lymphomagenesis have yielded promising targets for novel drugs in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.Areas covered: This article provides a comprehensive review of approved synthetic drugs targeting the BTK, PI3K, immunomodulation, proteasome, HDAC, EZH2, and nuclear export pathways in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The review includes coverage of the pharmacology, efficacy, toxicity, and active areas of research for each drug. The authors also provide their expert perspectives on the field and their opinions for the future.Expert opinion: Although novel synthetic drugs have generally not impacted clinical practice to the same extent as immune and cellular therapies, there remains an important role for targeted drugs in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly in the relapsed setting and for patients ineligible for more intensive therapies. Clinical outcomes and tolerability may improve further with the development of newer generations of synthetic drugs and emerging combination regimens with other targeted and immune therapies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin , Synthetic Drugs , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Signal Transduction , Synthetic Drugs/pharmacology , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
19.
BioDrugs ; 35(2): 175-186, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33595833

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to update the understanding of the development of paradoxical immune-mediated glomerular disorders (IGDs) in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with biologics and targeted synthetic drugs (ts-drugs). METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed by searching PubMed for articles published between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2020 reporting on the development of IGD in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who were receiving biologics or ts-drugs. IGDs were classified on the basis of clinical, laboratory and histopathological data as (1) glomerulonephritis associated with systemic vasculitis (GNSV), (2) isolated autoimmune renal disorder (IARD) or (3) glomerulonephritis in SLE and in lupus-like syndrome (GNLS). The World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) system for standardized case causality assessment was applied to evaluate the causal relationship between IGD and specific drugs. The classification was based on a six-category scale, where the "certain" and "probable" categories were deemed clinically relevant relationships. RESULTS: The literature search retrieved 875 articles. Of these, 16 articles reported IGD data, for a total of 25 cases. According to the WHO-UMC assessment, the strength of the causal relationship between IGDs and investigated drugs was higher for anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents (a clinically relevant relationship was found in four of six cases), abatacept (one of two cases), tocilizumab (two cases), ustekinumab (one case) and tofacitinib (one case) than for rituximab (nine cases), belimumab (three cases) or secukinumab (one case), which showed a weak causal relationship with these paradoxical events. No cases associated with apremilast or baricitinib were found. The retrieved cases were classified as 11 GNLS, seven IARD and seven GNSV. CONCLUSIONS: Biologics and ts-drugs can cause IGDs. These events are rare, and the causative effect of a specific drug is hard to establish. When a patient is suspected of having an IGD, the drug should be discontinued, and treatment for the new-onset renal disorder should be promptly started.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Synthetic Drugs , Abatacept/adverse effects , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Products/adverse effects , Humans , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use
20.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 890: 173657, 2021 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33096111

ABSTRACT

Oral cancer, as one of the most prevalent and invasive cancers that invade local tissue, can cause metastasis, and have high mortality. In 2018, around 355,000 worldwide oral cancers occurred and resulted in 177,000 deaths. Estimates for the year 2020 include about 53,260 new cases added to previous year's cases, and the estimated death toll from this cancer in 2020 is about 10,750 deaths more than previous years. Despite recent advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, unfortunately, 50% of people with cancer cannot be cured. Of course, it should be remembered that the type of treatment used greatly influences patient recovery. There are not many choices when it comes to treating oral cancer. Research efforts focusing on the discovery and evolution of innovative therapeutic approaches for oral cancer are essential. Such traditional methods of treating this type of cancer like surgery and chemotherapy, have evolved dramatically during the past thirty to forty years, but they continue to cause panic among patients due to their side effects. Therefore, it is necessary to study and use drugs that are less risky for the patient as well as to provide solutions to reduce chemotherapy-induced adverse events that prevent many therapeutic risks. As mentioned above, this study examines low-risk therapies such as herbal remedies, biological drugs, and synthetic drugs in the hope that they will be useful to physicians, researchers, and scientists around the world.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Biological Products/therapeutic use , Mouth Neoplasms/drug therapy , Plant Preparations/therapeutic use , Synthetic Drugs/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Biological Products/chemistry , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/metabolism , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Plant Preparations/chemistry , Synthetic Drugs/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...